Hosted by
Tereza Coraggio

Third Paradigm is an out-of-the-box thinktank on community sovereignty and regenerative economics.

We look at how to take back our cities, farmland and water; our money, production and trade; our media, education and culture, our religion and even our God.

We present a people's history of the Bible and a parent's view on how to raise giving kids in a taking world.

Search this Site
Keep updated every week with summaries of new radios shows, plus original writing posted on the site.


Subscribe to RSS Feed
3rd Paradigm is broadcast on:

Radio Free Brighton
Tu 2:30 pm, Th 5:30 pm (UK)
Tu 6:30 am, Th 9:30 am (PST)

Free Radio Santa Cruz
Listen Live Sun 1:30 PST

Upstart Radio online

Tereza has been interviewed on...

Talkabout with Kevin Spitzer, KZSC Santa Cruz

3rd Paradigm has been featured on these shows and stations:

Unwelcome Guests
by Robin Upton
on multiple stations

The Wringer
by Pete Bianco

WHCL Hamilton College

Global Notes
by Roger Barrett
CHLS Radio Lillooet

New World Notes
by Ken Dowst, WWUH
West Hartford, CT

3rd Paradigm has been viewed from:

Australia

Chatswood, NSW
Liverpool, NSW
Sydney, NSW
Brisbane, Queensland
Adelaide, S. Australia
Hurstbridge, Victoria
Melbourne, Victoria
Mildura, Victoria

Austria

Graz, Steiermark

Azerbaijan

Baku

Belgium

Burssels, Hoofdstedelijk Gewest
Zoersel, Antwerpen

Bolivia

La Paz

Bosnia & Herzegovina

Bijeljina, Republica Srpska

Brazil

Curitiba, Parana
Guaranta do Norte
Sao Paulo

Bulgaria

Sofia, Grad Sofiya

Canada

Edmonton, Alberta
Red Deer, Alberta
Agassiz, BC
Burnaby, BC
Nelson, BC
Port Coquitlam, BC
Richmond, BC
Victoria, BC
Hubbart Point, Manitoba
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Stewiacke, Nova Scotia
Brampton, Ontario
Guelph, Ontario
Brantford, Ontario
Kingston, Ontario
Kitchener, Ontario
Longueuil, Ontario
Thornhill, Ontario
Toronto, Ontario
Waterloo, Ontario
Longueuil, Quebec
Montreal, Quebec

Chile

Santiago, Region Metropolitana

China

Nanjing, Jiangsu
Lanzhou

Croatia

Rijeka, Primorsko-Goranska

Denmark

Ċlborg, Nordjylland
Joure, Friesland
Nørre, Alslev Storstrom
Odense, Fyn
Tranbjerg, Arhus

Egypt

Cairo, Al Qahirah
Alexandria, Al Iskandariyah

France

Martigues, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur
Saint-Martin-d'heres, Rhone-Alpes

Germany

Gomaringen, Baden-Wurttemberg
Neuhausen,Baden-Wurttemberg
Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen
Dusseldorf, Nordrhein-Westlfalen
Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt
Reitburg, Nordrhein-Westlfalen

Hong Kong

Central District

India

Bangalore, Karnataka
Chandigarh
Delhi
Haveri, Karnataka
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
Madras, Tamal Nadu
Mumbai, Maharashtra
New Delhi

Indonesia

Bogor, Jawa Barat

Iran

Tehran, Esfahan

Ireland

Dublin
Roscrea

Israel

Tel Aviv

Italy

Modena, Emilia-Romagna

Japan

Nagoya, Aichi

Jordan

Amman, Amman Governate

Lithuania

Vilnius, Vilniaus Apskritis

Luxembourg

Leudelange

Malaysia

Segambut, Kuala Lumpur

Malta

Birkirkara

Mexico

Distrito Federal
Cancun, Quintana Roo
Playa del Carmen, Quintana Roo

Moldova, Republic of

Chisinau

Netherlands

Arnhem, Gelderland
Diemen, Noord Holland
Joure, Friesland
Lelystad, Flevoland
Tilburg, Noord-Brabant
Utrecht

New Zealand

Auckland
Dobson, West Coast

Nigeria

Benin, Edo

Norway

Arendal, Aust-Agder
Mestervik, Troms
Oslo

Pakistan

Rawalpindi, Punjab

Panama

Paitilla
Pueblo Nuevo, Chiriqui

Peru

Lima
Pisco, Ica

Philippines

Cainta, Rizal
Diliman, Bulacan
Philippine, Benguet
Quezon City
Roosevelt, Masbate
Quezon, Nueva Ecija

Poland

Katowice, Slaskie

Portugal

Algueirão, Lisboa
Atouguia Da Baleia, Leiria
Carnaxide, Lisboa
Guimarães, Braga
Sines, Setubal

Qatar

Doha, Ad Dawhah

Romania

Arad

Saudi Arabia

Riyadh, Ar Riyad

Senegal

Dakar

Serbia

Cacak

Seychelles

Victoria, Beau Vallon

Singapore

Bedok

South Africa

Cape Town, Western Cape
Johannesburg, Gauteng
Roodepoort, Gauteng
Parow, Western Cape

South Korea

Seoul, Seoul-t'ukpyolsi

Spain

Barcelona, Catalonia
Madrid
Salamanca, Castilla y Leon
Tarragona, Catalonia

Sri Lanka

Kandy, Central

Sweden

Gothenburg, Vastra Gotaland
Storvreta, Uppsala Lan
Sundbyburg, Stockholms Lan

Switzerland

Biel, Bern
Lausanne, Vaud
Sarnen, Obwalden
Zürich

Syrian Arab Republic

Damascus, Dimashq

Thailand

Bangkok, Krung Thep
Nonthaburi

Turkey

Istanbul

Ukraine

Donetsk
Kiev Kyyivs'ka Oblast'

UK

Bury
Hounslow
Huddersfield, Kirklees
Larkhall, South Lanarkshire
Leeds
Liverpool
London
Market Drayton, Shropshire
Southampton
Surbiton, Surrey
Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands
Twickenham, Richmond upon Thames

United Arab Emirates

Dubai

US

AK AL AZ CA CO CT FL GA IA IL IN KS KY MA ME MI MN MO MS NE NH NJ NV NY OH OK OR PA RI SC TN TX VA WA WI WV

Venezuela

Cabudare, Lara
3rd Paradigm is grateful for:

Wikipedia Affiliate Button

Ironweed Film Club

Foreign Policy in Focus

Reality Sandwich

Charity Focus

Past Shows

 

Two Things in Life are Certain: Debt & Taxes

March 27, 2010

3P-059 Show Information (includes MP3 download link)


Welcome to the 59th episode of Third Paradigm. Our title this week is "Two Things in Life are Certain: Debt and Taxes." We're going to look at the assumptions of the normalcy of debt and taxes on which the monetary system is based. Although Iceland is challenging their assumption of debt, along with Greece and Ecuador. In our episode Clash of the Continents, we found that every person in Iceland owed $360,000 for the national debt or 1000% of the GDP. Ireland was even higher at $450,000. So structural adjustment isn't just for third-world countries anymore, according to the IMF. Greece may want to look at Ecuador's debt assessment process, to learn how they're determining what debt they consider legitimate and what not.

http://vault.bz/2009/03/default-vulnerability-rank-of-debt-to-gdp-nearly-all-euro-zone-except-usa/

But I'd like to ask, are national debts ever legitimate? When the European nations gave up their own currencies, did they also give up their own sovereignty? Every sovereign state has the right to print their own money, determine how it's distributed, and set preferential standards so its citizen can compete against foreign-made goods and not lose their assets to foreign money. Protectionism should be one of the most holy words in our vocabularies. National debts are an advance on future taxes, loaned by the taxpayers without their consent. It's taxation without representation, done through a sleight of hand. Instead of requiring a vote for additional taxes, they take out a mortgage on our future earnings with our lives as collateral. Did we authorize this when John Hancock put his mark on the Constitution?

http://www.barefootsworld.net/doi1776.html

National debts are incurred to fund things that aren't popular enough to tax, like wars and mercenary armies. But like any household budget, the bills have to be paid before the groceries can be bought. When there's nothing left for the bread and butter, the Republicans start wanting to slash services and the Democrats start wanting to raise taxes. Neither side questions the legitimacy of the national debt, which has diverted funds from human services. And if you're the loan collateral, are you free or are you the property of the state? Your wages are systematically garnished to repay debts you never agreed to; you're an indentured servant no matter how little or how much you make.

Neither Democrats nor Republicans question the interest we pay to "Federal Reserve" bankers for loaning us our currency. Is Washington a corporation or a government? A corporation exists for the profit of a few, but a government should exist for the protection of the many. How does it work to borrow our currency? In order to pay the interest, more currency needs to be produced, again backed by the borrowed funds of the Federal Reserve. When our interest repayment takes the money out of circulation, does it reduce the principal, or do we continue to pay interest on it in perpetuity? To replace the interest payment, new money has to be printed, backed by new reserves. This dilutes the value of the remaining money in circulation, which we call "inflation."

http://www.pickinglosers.com/month/2009/08

In addition, neither side questions why the Federal income tax is so much higher than the municipal or State tax, even though the vast majority of what we care about is provided by local government. And no one questions FICA, which is often presented as a savings plan rather than a tax. I've been listening to radio series called Wizards of Money produced by a woman who goes by the pseudonym Smithy. In The Imperial Budget and the Mythical Lockbox, she talks about FICA, which pays for Social Security and Medicare. Under Reagan, the FICA tax was increased while income taxes were decreased. The effect of this was to make our taxes less progressive. While Federal income tax increases at higher levels, FICA cuts off after $107,000. It's also most heavily–borne by the self-employed, since the employer pays half or, put another way, when you're your own employer, you pay double. This is a sneaky way of slipping in a tax that most people would object to if they saw the full rate. But even though employees only see half on their W-2, of course, their wages are still paying it. When the employer calculates the cost of the employee, it's at what's called the "fully-burdened rate" – doesn't that make you feel like an asset to your employer?

What is the FICA rate? Even though my background's in Human Resources and I should have known this, it still shocked me – between Social Security and Medicare, employer plus employee portions, it comes to 15.3%. 15.3%! A self-employed person who made $40,000 would pay $6,000 in FICA, and almost the same amount, $6100, in Federal income tax. In California, they'd pay $4400 in state income tax, or $16,500 altogether. This leaves the person with a median income less than $2000 a month to pay for housing, food, insurance, and bills.

As income increases over $107,000, however, FICA as a percentage of income goes down. Therefore, those who can least afford health insurance for themselves or their kids are proportionally paying the most to extend the lives of our seniors. 77% of Medicare expenditures occur in the last year of life, 52% of them in the last 2mo, and 40% in the last month. Inpatient expenses, especially in the Intensive Care Unit, account for over 70% of these costs. The costs are highest for those with the lowest probability of surviving another six months. Those who do survive often experience such a low quality of life and chronic pain that they're not sure it was worth it.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/just-how-progressive-is-the-tax-system/

Is this how we, as a society, want to prioritize our healthcare system? Let's go all out for the dying, but the living can fend for themselves. Let's make abortion unavailable, except to those who can afford to raise a child. Then, to punish the mothers, we'll withhold healthcare from them and their babies. Spending a few thousand to ensure a healthy newborn is socialism; instead we should spend hundreds of thousands to extend a greater than average lifespan one more month. What if half of Medicare provided free reproductive care, free pre-natal care, and basic healthcare for all pre-school children? And then we limited care for those over 80 to palliative only – no life-saving interventions, but excellent pain-free, compassionate, personal, hospice care. If federal funds can't be used for abortions, then the government owes every child a right to life after birth.

Let's take a break from death and taxes for some poems about strong, beautiful women. When we return, we'll get back to the FICA tax, explore some deviant art about where our taxes go, and end with a parable. But first, this is No More Cliches by Octavio Paz, followed by a found poem by Marilyn Nelson called The Tao of the Trial.

http://www.panhala.net/Archive/No_More_Cliches.html

No More Clichés

Beautiful face
That like a daisy opens its petals to the sun
So do you
Open your face to me as I turn the page.

Enchanting smile
Any man would be under your spell,
Oh, beauty of a magazine.

How many poems have been written to you?
How many Dantes have written to you, Beatrice?
To your obsessive illusion
To your manufactured fantasy.

But today I won't make one more Cliché
And write this poem to you.
No, no more clichés.

This poem is dedicated to those women
Whose beauty is in their charm,
In their intelligence,
In their character,
Not on their fabricated looks.

This poem is to you women,
That like a Shahrazade wake up
Everyday with a new story to tell,
A story that sings for change
That hopes for battles:
Battles for the love of the united flesh
Battles for passions aroused by a new day
Battles for the neglected rights
Or just battles to survive one more night.

Yes, to you women in a world of pain
To you, bright star in this ever-spending universe
To you, fighter of a thousand-and-one fights
To you, friend of my heart.

From now on, my head won't look down to a magazine
Rather, it will contemplate the night
And its bright stars,
And so, no more clichés.

~ Octavio Paz ~
http://www.leabooks.com/LEA-Spanish%20Pages/Literatura/Paginas%20de%20Autor/Paz,%20Octavio/Paz-Obras.htm
From From the trial transcript:
Miss Crandall's Boarding School for Young Ladies and Misses of Color
Canterbury, CT, 1833-34


* * * * * * * *

http://www.panhala.net/The_Tao_of_the_Trial.html

The Tao of the Trial

Miss Crandall, you stand accused of knowingly
teaching colored persons not resident of the state,
without prior consent. What is your plea?

The Teacher does not instruct. The Teacher waits.

Girl, has anyone been teaching anything to you and your friends?

Who taught you how to plead the Fifth Amendment?

Your honor, I submit as evidence
of the alleged teachings of alleged students
this colored girl here, who openly reads books
and gazes skyward, who has been overheard
conversing animatedly in polysyllabic words
and referring off-handedly to the Ancient Greeks.

The Teacher teaches, without words and without action,
simplicity, patience, and compassion.

~ Marilyn Nelson ~
http://www.poetspress.org/guests/nelson.shtml
From Poetry, September 2005

The poems were No More Cliches by Octavio Paz, and The Tao of the Trial by Marilyn Nelson. The latter was written about Prudence Crandall, a Quaker who opened a school for Black girls in defiance of Connecticut law. She was certainly a woman of character, a Scheherazade with a story to tell of neglected rights. Octavio would have found her a fighter of a thousand-and-one fights, as did Mark Twain, who famously defended her.

For International Women's Day, Amy Goodman interviewed Mariko Lin Chang, whose study revealed that the median wealth assets for single black women is $100, single Hispanic women $120, and for single white women, $41,000. Mariko says, "...even if men and women had the same incomes, if nothing else changed, there would still be a wealth gap for women and a wealth gap for women of color, because they lack access to the wealth escalator, the fringe benefits and the government benefits that are already helping other people build wealth, and because they're more likely to be single parents.

These statistics have heavy significance and aren't to be taken lightly. But where is that government wealth escalator for whites, because most people I know feel like they're running up the wrong one? The focus should be on those who've thrown the escalator into reverse, so they can charge a toll for every step without letting any of us get off.

Let's get back to the history of Social Security and Medicare. Since Reagan increased FICA in 1983, it's run a surplus, adding up to $1.4 trillion. Reagan used this to fund his military build-up. More recently, Bush used the Social Security excess to fund the tax cuts that got him re-elected. But now that Social Security is pulling money out faster than it's being put in, many people are appalled to find that the surplus was spent. However, if you understand how money's created, there isn't any pocket that the government can use to put money away. If they did, it would take it out of circulation while we'd still be paying interest on it. Or it would be in a bank, where the Treasury would have to borrow more money to guarantee it. In reality, letting the Treasury spend the money back into the economy is the only way it can go. Social Security is always funded by current wage earners on a pay-as-you-go basis. It gives the illusion of a savings plan, but it's really a no-interest loan. The problem isn't whether more or less is going in than coming out. The problem, as far as the military is concerned, is that they used to have a surplus to buy more toys without parental approval. But now they're stuck having to ask for every darn billion.

Let's break for Monty Python with the song, "Money."

That was Monty Python with their song, "Money." But with money, taxes are sure to follow. A website called deviantart sells a detailed poster called Death and Taxes. It graphs out all of the expenditures of the Federal budget. I first looked at the 2004 budget, where military and non-military spending were neck-to-neck at $399 billion to $383 billion. But by the 2007 budget, it had gotten worse. Non-military had gone down to $350 billion, but military had risen to $632 billion, or 64%. The artist hasn't produced a 2010 chart yet, but the War Resisters League has a pie chart. It shows a total outlay of over $2.6 trillion for the 2009 budget, up from the $1 trillion of 2007. They show $965 billion for current military expenses, but also show $484 billion for veteran's benefits and interest on a national debt, which they estimate to be 80% due to past wars. So the grand total we're paying on this year's wars and still paying on past wars is $1.4 trillion, or more than double the rate of 2007.

http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm

Smithy compares the Roman Empire's budget in 150 CE. 70% was spent on the military, 10% on police and other civil services, 10% on other, mostly foreign affairs, and the remaining 10% was split between social services and economic infrastructure. Curiously, in the Roman empire and the US empire, the most expensive outlying provinces to keep in military aid were Judea and Egypt. By comparison to Rome, the US is a profligate spender on healthcare, which may reach 20%, due to an aging population intent on living longer. This will definitely cut into military spending. What's an empire to do?

Smithy suggests that perhaps a new religion is in order. The one invented by the Romans did pretty well in convincing soldiers to go to war without pay. But 2000 years later, experts find that fear of death increases among the religious and doesn't fall off until you get to the completely deluded. This is especially true of fundamentalism. But despite this one glitch, Christianity was far ahead of its time in imperial propaganda. Let's look at a Bible story about the management of one of these troublesome provinces.

Jesus tells this parable: A man of noble birth is planning a trip to the imperial power to have himself appointed king of his region. But first, he calls three of his top advisors and gives each a million dollars, saying "put this to work until I return." His future subjects, who hate him, send a delegation of human rights NGO's to lobby and try to stop the appointment. But the empire controls the media and he's made king anyway. When he returns, he questions the servants: "So what did you do with my million dollars?"

The first one says, "I funded a paramilitary army to protect foreign investments and oil concessions. Now it's 10 million." "Well-done, my good servant," he replies, "you'll be my Secretary of Defense." The second one says, "I wrote preferential trade agreements for multinational corporations. Now it's 5 million." "Excellent, my good man. You'll be my Prime Minister." And so it went.

Finally, the last advisor strides in and throws a suitcase at him, saying, "Here's your stinking million. I won't be a collaborator and I don't want your dirty money because you take what doesn't belong to you and you reap what don't sow. You're a vicious tyrant and this is what we, the people, think of your IMF loans and corporate kickbacks." He spits in his face.

The king wipes off the spit and said, "If you knew that I take what I didn't earn, you could at least have put it in the bank to get me more of what I didn't earn." He laughs cruelly and the advisors laugh along. He hands the suitcase to the man with ten million and says, "Here's a little present." The other advisors object, but he says, "To everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what he has will be taken away. Now take this scum and torture him. Find out every name of those who didn't want me to be king over them. Bring them here and kill them in front of me... slowly." Finishing this sweet parable, Jesus then enters Jerusalem as its King, first subduing a donkey that had never been ridden. He says that even the stones would proclaim him as King, and predicts that Jerusalem will be under siege and torn apart, with all its children killed, because they didn't recognize him as God. Although the story is set in 30 CE, it's written after Rome's siege of the troublesome province in 70, when everyone trapped inside Jerusalem was tortured, killed, or enslaved, because they had refused to be ridden like a beast of burden. I often hear people say that they wish the Christian leaders would pay more attention to Jesus' teachings. In my humble opinion, they already have.

This has been Tereza Coraggio with Third Paradigm. Thank you to Skidmark Bob for sound production and to Mike Scirocco for all things web. A huge thank you to Jackie Chase at Radio Free Brighton, who's broadcasting Third Paradigm Tuesday, Thursdays and Sundays at prime-time! See our website, thirdparadigm.org for times and links. And thanks to Robin Upton, our Bangladesh listener, who was visiting his mum in the vicinity of Brighton and took the time to check out some radical radio. I also have Robin to thank for archiving Smithy and her excellent series, Wizards of Money. Her broadcasts are now defunct but unfortunately still perfectly relevant. As an investment risk analyst, she took the career risk of producing the show after hearing Democracy Now and realizing that someone had to bell the cat. So thank you Amy. Our final song is Taxman by The Beatles.

Thank you for listening.

3